Minnesota announced Tuesday it is suing the federal government for withholding $243 million in Medicaid payments.
State officials say the move puts health care coverage for more than 1 million residents at risk while sidestepping the administrative process already underway.
Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison and the Minnesota Department of Human Services filed the lawsuit jointly in federal court. State officials allege the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services moved forward with the deferral before completing the required review tied to its January noncompliance notice.
Under Medicaid, the federal government shares costs with the state to provide health coverage to low-income residents, seniors, and people with disabilities. The program covers families earning up to $42,759 annually for a household of four, according to the Minnesota Department of Human Services.
Ellison said the state is challenging what he called an unlawful attempt to cut funding before proving any wrongdoing.
“The Trump Administration’s M.O. is to cut first, no matter what the law says or who gets hurt, and ask questions later, if at all,” Ellison said. “These cuts are the latest in a long series of efforts to go around the law to punish Minnesotans-but just as we fought back and won when they illegally tried to cut funding for childcare, hungry families, and our schools, we are suing them again today to make them follow the law.”
Ellison also noted his office’s record on Medicaid fraud enforcement, which includes more than 300 convictions and $80 million in judgments and restitution, and said the state continues to pursue additional oversight tools.
President Donald Trump has framed the pause as part of a nationwide “War on Fraud,” with Vice President J.D. Vance leading the effort. Vance said the administration would not allow taxpayer dollars to be misused.
“We have decided to temporarily halt certain amounts of Medicaid funding that are going to the state of Minnesota,” Vance said. “Far too many people have gotten rich by taking what is best of the American spirit and getting rich off of it instead of providing services to kids who need it.”
The lawsuit follows the Trump administration’s Feb. 25 announcement that it would pause $259 million in federal Medicaid payments owed to Minnesota. Gov. Tim Walz criticized the decision.
“This isn’t a deferral, it’s a ransom note,” Walz said. “The Trump Administration is using kids as pawns in their campaign of retribution against our state.”
Technically, the pause is a deferral in payments, which Minnesota called an “unprecedented” method to audit funds.
“Deferrals have never been used to categorically deny funds to a state across entire service areas, as is being done here,” Ellison’s office said in a statement. “The unprecedented February 25 deferral is more than 15 times larger than any past deferral Minnesota has been issued.”
The legal dispute comes as fraud investigations across Minnesota continue, with independent and federal investigators estimating potential schemes totaling between $9 billion and $20 billion. The White House described fraud in Minnesota as “pervasive and disturbing.”
The $243 million at issue is part of a broader dispute over more than $2 billion in annual Medicaid funding flagged by the Trump administration in January, pending the completion of the state’s administrative appeal. Minnesota officials say the larger threat underscores what they see as an “unprecedented” approach to addressing fraud.
State officials say withheld payments represent roughly 7% of Minnesota’s quarterly Medicaid funding and warn the loss-even temporarily-could force reductions in healthcare services for low-income families or require lawmakers to shift money from other parts of the state budget.
Minnesota is seeking a temporary restraining order to immediately block the funding pause while the legal challenge proceeds in federal court.
While an initiative of the federal government, state lawmakers are also looking to address fraud.
In the past few weeks, Republicans have renewed calls for a statewide independent Office of the Inspector General, arguing broader oversight is needed amid ongoing probes into alleged fraud in taxpayer-funded programs. Walz has also introduced his own “comprehensive anti-fraud package.”
